Posts Tagged ‘user generated content’

Second-degree conference value* from UX Australia

Thursday, September 10th, 2009

Although I didn’t make it to (what sounded like an amazing) UX Australia conference in Canberra the other week, I’ve been learning from the presentations that have been posted so far on Slideshare.

I haven’t looked through all of them but here are a few particular presentations and my notes about points I found useful:

  • Uxau09 More Content Quality B – David More
    Looks at how to develop collaborative/useful information architecture in complex organisation with plenty of stakeholders; and getting non-expert authors to generate content.
  • Emerging a User Experience Strategy – Penny Hagen
    An example about the process in creating a user experience for UNSW.
  • Experience Visions: A Case Study – Fred Randell
    About experience visions and dealing with Telstra, which provides good tips for dealing with large/complex organisations/developments.
  • More, Better, Faster! Agile Design for Fun & Profit – Matt Balara
    A useful overview of agile development. There’s a short case-study from slide 57 onwards about the redevelopment of the ecco shoes web site which visually shows the process.
  • Design For Multiple Touchpoints – Shane Morris
    Has some information about the process behind developing the Lonely Planet Surface, and includes information about how people interact with things they can touch (which can also relate to iphones, mobiles, screens, etc)
  • Ka-chunk! When customer experience design fails and how to avoid it – Joel Flom
    I like the general statements in this presentation, and the diagrams on Slides 21 and 22 showing balance between business, customer and implementation.

* “second-degree conference value” is a quote from UX Australia organiser, Steve Baty, when I referred to how much I was learning without being there.

Digital business model for music

Thursday, March 12th, 2009

Thanks to a tweet from @grantyoung I found a video of Michael Masnick’s (Floor64/Techdirt) “How Trent Reznor and NiN Represent the Future of the Music Business” case study from midem09.

The presentation looks at Trent Reznor’s business methods while with a major record label as well as once he struck out on his own – experimental actions that have generated awareness of Nine Inch Nails, made fans happy and have encouraged sales of his music. This is an area in which a lot of labels and bands have struggled recently, and with my personal passion for music, I was interested to see a view point on where music is headed.

music notes

Core ideas behind Michael Masnick’s presentation revolve around CwF (Connect with Fans) and RtB (Reason to Buy):

CwF + RtB = $$$$

Reznor’s CwF examples include:

  • certain characters were highlighted on the back of tour t-shirts that had to be put together to figure out a URL for a special web site.
  • USB keys loaded up with new music were left on the floors of venues. This music was then shared out by fans.
  • music was given away for free and encouraged to be remixed.
  • sampler packages of songs by opening bands on NiN tours were compiled and shared through the web site.
  • less obvious items were added to the web site such as:
    • aggregated photos from flickr and videos from youtube
    • wallpapers and images were provided under a creative commons license
    • remixing of songs was encouraged to involve people in the music
    • contests were held such as hiding tickets on the forums or physically planting free tickets at particular geo co-ordinates for people to find
    • email sent to fans made Trent Reznor seem human

Reznor’s RtB examples include:

  • physical CDs were sold that changed colour due to the rise in temperature when they were played in CD players – although the songs were also available for free, fans wanted the actual CDs because they couldn’t duplicate the functionality themselves.
  • CDs gave access to added benefits such as free downloads.
  • options were provided to fans – multiple editions of albums were released such as a deluxe edition package with DVD, Bluray disc and booklet, and an ultra deluxe edition with a limited print of 2,500 which were personally signed by Trent Reznor – people could choose the level of interest and pay (or take freely) as they chose.

Some key points from the presentation:

  • the date of release of free albums was timed to coincide with concert date announcements.
  • the $300 ultra deluxe edition sold out of 2,500 copies in less than 30 hours which means that people paid $750,000 for music that they also could have accessed for free.
  • price is not the issue as long as you can connect with fans.
  • you have to connect with fans all the time and experiment constantly.
  • the acronyms can also be considered as CwF (Compete with Free) and RtB (Return to Business, rather than complain about pirates and new technology).
  • you don’t need collective licensing, DRM, lawsuits, copyright.
  • giving people Reason to Buy can make it work for fans and musicians.
  • other bands can make this same formula work: CtW + RtB = $$$$

I personally think it can be a challenge for a band or musician to break through the noise but persistence, passion and an open nature can make you much more appealing for fans to hold on to.. quality of music of course provides a significant helping hand. Although I don’t want to be in a direct line of communication with my favourite bands (perhaps in the same way I’ve never wanted to line up to get an autograph from anyone famous), having the chance to hear work-in-progress material, see candid photos, or read about how a recording session is going makes me feel more involved and more interested in the end product.

Check out Michael Masnick’s presentation at YouTube.

Visa could go a little better

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

This post is broken up in to three parts:

Check your content

I was pointed towards the visa.com/go campaign which integrates photographs submitted via Flickr.

Before looking at the photographs themselves, being Finnish myself I was surprised to see a Finnish flag appear on screen, but I wondered what the “HW” letters referred to:

visa

Finnish flag on the visa.com/go site

Clicking on the image, the screen zoomed in to show a big Finnish flag which was then replaced with a statistic about Hawaii. Huh?

visa

Finland does not equal Hawaii

Trying the “see another” link I was shown other flags and statistics which matched up correctly. Finland appears to have suffered from a graphic and content mix-up.

Most sites have some errors or typos, but on a site that heavily relies on user generated content and appears to only have a small number of constant elements, this error should be avoidable during a review process. When this campaign revolves around the theme of the world, a mislabeling of this sort feels quite significant.

If you request user input and use their submitted content, inform the user

This campaign encourages people to contribute to a Visa sponsored Flickr group so that a person’s photo might be used on the visa.com/go site. A discussion has begun on the Flickr group about the notification process for people whose photos are chosen – Visa (or their representative) admitted that their intention was not to notify people, however after several other people chimed in to the discussion, Visa (or their representative) has changed their mind stating that they are now looking in to notifications.

When people take time out to specifically contribute to a web site or campaign and their content requires moderation/selection, providing a small communication on acceptance is important to make people feel that their contribution was considered and the brand values their input. In Visa’s case, a note to the photographer via FlickrMail when a photo is used could be a simple addition to the selection process.

I look forward to seeing how Visa tackles this request from the contributors.

Be clear about who you are

The person who appears to be managing the Visa Flickr group has the rather odd username “visabrandakqa”. Although the Flickr group shows a note that “This group is sponsored by Visa” allowing people to see that it is an official brand channel, the visabrandakqa has no similar label.

“Sponsored users” might not be possible in Flickr at this stage, however visiting visabrandakqa’s profile sheds no further light on who this “person” is. The profile is empty apart from one contact and links to a couple of groups – one being the Visa campaign and another for “Land Rover Life” (how is that related to Visa?!). Viewing the profile creates confusion about who is running the Visa group.

The profile could be used to reassure people curious about the promotion that this is a representative of Visa (or the agency behind the campaign) and to further promote Visa’s Flickr activity.  I feel that leaving the profile blank is a missed opportunity to encourage participation.

Visa's Flickr group administrator profile

Visa's Flickr group administrator profile