Posts Tagged ‘twitter’

Monitoring the buzz

Tuesday, August 25th, 2009

There is a growing amount of discussion happening about understanding the return-on-investment of social media.

eg. What is the value of spending $100k to encourage chatter? Will it generate sales? Just because people are talking about you, how can you tell if that conversation is actually doing more damage than good?

I’ve been reading a number of articles recently, but this one in particular pointed towards research and mathematics so I followed one link to another to compile this list of reads:

Tweeting from digital agencies

Monday, March 30th, 2009

Chris Lake has tried to track down the twitter accounts of the top 50 UK interactive agencies (as ranked by New Media Age) in his Econsultancy post Digital agencies on Twitter (or are they?). While looking at who is practicing what they preach he found that of the top 50, a couple of agencies are very active on twitter, some slightly active, others have only claimed their names, while many are no where to be seen.

He suggests “roughly a 25% adoption rate” so I decided to spin some numbers for a closer look and found that if you include those who have at least claimed their names then this boosts the figure to 36%, or 18 out of the 50 agencies.

Out of those 18 agencies with twitter accounts, only 33% are independently owned – this surprised me as I had assumed that independent agencies may be more inclined and less restricted by red-tape to leap on to twitter. On the other hand I did have a correct hunch when I found that 67% of the twittering agencies, whether independent or otherwise, have less than 100 staff members – perhaps smaller companies find it easier to react to new technologies and co-ordinate engagement.

Breaking down the types of agencies that are twittering: 67% classify as Marketing, 22% as Design & Build, and 11% as Technical.

The comments to Chris’ post vary from minor debate about whether or not to judge an agency on its twitter presence to pointing out that individuals within the companies are often active tweeters even if there isn’t a company presence. Some responses question the point behind setting up a company account.

Claiming your company brand is useful to avoid brand-squatters and communicating via twitter can help to spread news. A central account can provide a link between staff, helping employees to connect, and potential employees to explore further in to the agency. Depending on the type of agency, a company twitter account can be used to:

  • Share information and findings
  • Seek advice on solving issues
  • Update industry friends or inquisitives about latest campaigns
  • Link to useful articles
  • Develop partnerships with local businesses
  • Promote your business
  • Encourage staff knowledge-sharing
  • Provide an accessible point of contact
  • Announce job vacancies
  • Demonstrate the culture of the company to potential employees
  • Access a community willing to give you a few minutes for testing/feedback
  • Spread the word about industry events
  • Have a laugh

It doesn’t hurt to think about defining some measurements (they might just help you with your next social media pitch) but remember that not all metrics are equal. If you’re interested in measuring twitter success, I’d recommend reading yongfook‘s recent post, Social Media ROI, which provides helpful tips and examples of defining metrics.

Bouncing off the Skittles buzz

Monday, March 2nd, 2009

I’ve seen a lot of emails, twitter messages, and blog posts today about the new skittles.com web site which is a portal to Skittles related content from twitter, flickr, youtube, facebook and wikipedia. Skittles has opened up their brand to be described by the people who want to talk about it. And with the new hype, that conversation is taking some odd turns.

There’s no point quoting the obvious stabs that some people are inflicting with the realisation that they can have their 15 minutes 2 seconds of fame on the Skittles “home page”, but other companies are taking the initiative to hijack the hype to spread word about themselves such as this tweet:

twitter message

Skittles twitter hijack

And I’m all for limiting/stopping the marketing of junk food to kids but would you really expect to find a Date of Birth question visiting a confectionary web site and have to shield your kids from seeing the site for fear of what they might read (currently a couple of obsceneties per search page)?

Skittles and kids

Skittles and kids

I’m certain that after the initial rush the excitement will die down and the crude tweets will decrease. Maybe the Skittles Wikipedia page (which looks rather carefully crafted) will skip mass defacing … maybe.

Brave move, and I look forward to seeing how things progress. At the least they’ve suddenly got people talking about their little sweets, social media and user generated content.

A couple of more extensive pieces of commentary on the Skittles approach: