Posts Tagged ‘social media’

Monitoring the buzz

Tuesday, August 25th, 2009

There is a growing amount of discussion happening about understanding the return-on-investment of social media.

eg. What is the value of spending $100k to encourage chatter? Will it generate sales? Just because people are talking about you, how can you tell if that conversation is actually doing more damage than good?

I’ve been reading a number of articles recently, but this one in particular pointed towards research and mathematics so I followed one link to another to compile this list of reads:

Tweeting from digital agencies

Monday, March 30th, 2009

Chris Lake has tried to track down the twitter accounts of the top 50 UK interactive agencies (as ranked by New Media Age) in his Econsultancy post Digital agencies on Twitter (or are they?). While looking at who is practicing what they preach he found that of the top 50, a couple of agencies are very active on twitter, some slightly active, others have only claimed their names, while many are no where to be seen.

He suggests “roughly a 25% adoption rate” so I decided to spin some numbers for a closer look and found that if you include those who have at least claimed their names then this boosts the figure to 36%, or 18 out of the 50 agencies.

Out of those 18 agencies with twitter accounts, only 33% are independently owned - this surprised me as I had assumed that independent agencies may be more inclined and less restricted by red-tape to leap on to twitter. On the other hand I did have a correct hunch when I found that 67% of the twittering agencies, whether independent or otherwise, have less than 100 staff members - perhaps smaller companies find it easier to react to new technologies and co-ordinate engagement.

Breaking down the types of agencies that are twittering: 67% classify as Marketing, 22% as Design & Build, and 11% as Technical.

The comments to Chris’ post vary from minor debate about whether or not to judge an agency on its twitter presence to pointing out that individuals within the companies are often active tweeters even if there isn’t a company presence. Some responses question the point behind setting up a company account.

Claiming your company brand is useful to avoid brand-squatters and communicating via twitter can help to spread news. A central account can provide a link between staff, helping employees to connect, and potential employees to explore further in to the agency. Depending on the type of agency, a company twitter account can be used to:

  • Share information and findings
  • Seek advice on solving issues
  • Update industry friends or inquisitives about latest campaigns
  • Link to useful articles
  • Develop partnerships with local businesses
  • Promote your business
  • Encourage staff knowledge-sharing
  • Provide an accessible point of contact
  • Announce job vacancies
  • Demonstrate the culture of the company to potential employees
  • Access a community willing to give you a few minutes for testing/feedback
  • Spread the word about industry events
  • Have a laugh

It doesn’t hurt to think about defining some measurements (they might just help you with your next social media pitch) but remember that not all metrics are equal. If you’re interested in measuring twitter success, I’d recommend reading yongfook’s recent post, Social Media ROI, which provides helpful tips and examples of defining metrics.

Gravatars for amateurs

Wednesday, March 18th, 2009
Gravatars

Examples of gravatars

This blog is powered by a recent version of Wordpress which now displays images alongside some people’s comments. I’ve seen these small custom graphics accompanying posts and comments on blogs for a while but now with my own blog making use of them it was time to investigate further. A right-click to check the properties on someone’s graphic pointed me to gravatar.com.

Gravatars are “globally recognized avatars”. When you post or comment at certain blogs with an email address you’ve registered with gravatar.com, your chosen avatar will automatically appear with your text.

With some help from the super-quick support team at wordpress.com (which is somehow connected with the gravatar user account process) I was able to setup my own account, assign a few of my most common email addresses, and now my comments around the blogosphere will display the avatar of my choice.

Use of gravatars helps to brand your online activities. Some people maintain consistent avatars across Flickr, Twitter, Facebook, Myspace, etc. Being able to use the same avatar in blog posts provides additional visual queues to people already aware of you, or you can draw interest from strangers and stand out from the crowd based on your choice of avatar.

Brands that monitor and comment on blogs would do well to set up a gravatar that includes a logo or product image. Used appropriately it can create brand awareness and provide a level of authenticity to comments.

For more information, take a look at:

Digital business model for music

Thursday, March 12th, 2009

Thanks to a tweet from @grantyoung I found a video of Michael Masnick’s (Floor64/Techdirt) “How Trent Reznor and NiN Represent the Future of the Music Business” case study from midem09.

The presentation looks at Trent Reznor’s business methods while with a major record label as well as once he struck out on his own - experimental actions that have generated awareness of Nine Inch Nails, made fans happy and have encouraged sales of his music. This is an area in which a lot of labels and bands have struggled recently, and with my personal passion for music, I was interested to see a view point on where music is headed.

music notes

Core ideas behind Michael Masnick’s presentation revolve around CwF (Connect with Fans) and RtB (Reason to Buy):

CwF + RtB = $$$$

Reznor’s CwF examples include:

  • certain characters were highlighted on the back of tour t-shirts that had to be put together to figure out a URL for a special web site.
  • USB keys loaded up with new music were left on the floors of venues. This music was then shared out by fans.
  • music was given away for free and encouraged to be remixed.
  • sampler packages of songs by opening bands on NiN tours were compiled and shared through the web site.
  • less obvious items were added to the web site such as:
    • aggregated photos from flickr and videos from youtube
    • wallpapers and images were provided under a creative commons license
    • remixing of songs was encouraged to involve people in the music
    • contests were held such as hiding tickets on the forums or physically planting free tickets at particular geo co-ordinates for people to find
    • email sent to fans made Trent Reznor seem human

Reznor’s RtB examples include:

  • physical CDs were sold that changed colour due to the rise in temperature when they were played in CD players - although the songs were also available for free, fans wanted the actual CDs because they couldn’t duplicate the functionality themselves.
  • CDs gave access to added benefits such as free downloads.
  • options were provided to fans - multiple editions of albums were released such as a deluxe edition package with DVD, Bluray disc and booklet, and an ultra deluxe edition with a limited print of 2,500 which were personally signed by Trent Reznor - people could choose the level of interest and pay (or take freely) as they chose.

Some key points from the presentation:

  • the date of release of free albums was timed to coincide with concert date announcements.
  • the $300 ultra deluxe edition sold out of 2,500 copies in less than 30 hours which means that people paid $750,000 for music that they also could have accessed for free.
  • price is not the issue as long as you can connect with fans.
  • you have to connect with fans all the time and experiment constantly.
  • the acronyms can also be considered as CwF (Compete with Free) and RtB (Return to Business, rather than complain about pirates and new technology).
  • you don’t need collective licensing, DRM, lawsuits, copyright.
  • giving people Reason to Buy can make it work for fans and musicians.
  • other bands can make this same formula work: CtW + RtB = $$$$

I personally think it can be a challenge for a band or musician to break through the noise but persistence, passion and an open nature can make you much more appealing for fans to hold on to.. quality of music of course provides a significant helping hand. Although I don’t want to be in a direct line of communication with my favourite bands (perhaps in the same way I’ve never wanted to line up to get an autograph from anyone famous), having the chance to hear work-in-progress material, see candid photos, or read about how a recording session is going makes me feel more involved and more interested in the end product.

Check out Michael Masnick’s presentation at YouTube.

Visa could go a little better

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

This post is broken up in to three parts:

Check your content

I was pointed towards the visa.com/go campaign which integrates photographs submitted via Flickr.

Before looking at the photographs themselves, being Finnish myself I was surprised to see a Finnish flag appear on screen, but I wondered what the “HW” letters referred to:

visa

Finnish flag on the visa.com/go site

Clicking on the image, the screen zoomed in to show a big Finnish flag which was then replaced with a statistic about Hawaii. Huh?

visa

Finland does not equal Hawaii

Trying the “see another” link I was shown other flags and statistics which matched up correctly. Finland appears to have suffered from a graphic and content mix-up.

Most sites have some errors or typos, but on a site that heavily relies on user generated content and appears to only have a small number of constant elements, this error should be avoidable during a review process. When this campaign revolves around the theme of the world, a mislabeling of this sort feels quite significant.

If you request user input and use their submitted content, inform the user

This campaign encourages people to contribute to a Visa sponsored Flickr group so that a person’s photo might be used on the visa.com/go site. A discussion has begun on the Flickr group about the notification process for people whose photos are chosen - Visa (or their representative) admitted that their intention was not to notify people, however after several other people chimed in to the discussion, Visa (or their representative) has changed their mind stating that they are now looking in to notifications.

When people take time out to specifically contribute to a web site or campaign and their content requires moderation/selection, providing a small communication on acceptance is important to make people feel that their contribution was considered and the brand values their input. In Visa’s case, a note to the photographer via FlickrMail when a photo is used could be a simple addition to the selection process.

I look forward to seeing how Visa tackles this request from the contributors.

Be clear about who you are

The person who appears to be managing the Visa Flickr group has the rather odd username “visabrandakqa”. Although the Flickr group shows a note that “This group is sponsored by Visa” allowing people to see that it is an official brand channel, the visabrandakqa has no similar label.

“Sponsored users” might not be possible in Flickr at this stage, however visiting visabrandakqa’s profile sheds no further light on who this “person” is. The profile is empty apart from one contact and links to a couple of groups - one being the Visa campaign and another for “Land Rover Life” (how is that related to Visa?!). Viewing the profile creates confusion about who is running the Visa group.

The profile could be used to reassure people curious about the promotion that this is a representative of Visa (or the agency behind the campaign) and to further promote Visa’s Flickr activity.  I feel that leaving the profile blank is a missed opportunity to encourage participation.

Visa's Flickr group administrator profile

Visa's Flickr group administrator profile

Flickrd Skittles

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

Following on from yesterday’s observations on the skittles.com experiment, today their Flickr account has been presumably deleted.

Yesterday the Skittles site’s “Pics” link showed the Skittles overlay on a Flickr user account displaying a handful of pretty product shots (a screenshot can be found at this Flickr discussion).  Today that same link instead goes to a Flickr search results page for the word “skittles”, bringing up user generated pictures. Yesterday’s user account appears to have disappeared.

Either someone within the Skittles project has realised that their use of Flickr in this way is against the terms of use (commercial use must be approved by Flickr), or Flickr has pulled the plug.

It’s quite strange that with the presumed intention to promote user generated content by setting the Skittles home page to show the “skittles” twitter search results, they originally opted to show their own content from Flickr.

Regardless, here’s the lesson: if you’re going to use content from outside of your own creation, or interfere with another site, read the fine print and contact the owners before proceeding.

skittles search on Flickr

skittles search on Flickr

Here’s another piece of commentary on the site: